


CAPITAL GAINS
The Internal Revenue Service classifies almost every profitable sale of property as a “taxable event.”
Under 26 U.S.C. § 61(a)(3), “gains derived from dealings in property” are included in their
definition of gross income.
-
Cryptocurrency and Bitcoin are treated as “property.” Selling for USD, exchanging for another coin, or even using it to buy goods is, by IRS rules, a taxable event
-
Real Estate: Selling for more than your adjusted basis produces a taxable gain unless youqualify for specific statutory exemptions (e.g., § 121 primary residence exclusion)
This is the default presumption applied to anyone the IRS considers a “taxpayer.”
The ROE Position
-
The Revocation of Election strategy isn’t about “hiding” income, it’s about correcting a legal classification
-
Federal income tax applies to federally connected activities, not to purely private, non-federally privileged transactions
-
If you have revoked the election to be treated as a taxpayer under Subtitle A, you have rebutted the presumption that your gains are part of the federally taxable category
-
Private property transactions, like selling crypto on a peer-to-peer basis or selling private real estate, fall outside the scope of Subtitle A taxation once jurisdiction is properly challenged
Even if your transaction is entirely private, third parties (title companies, crypto exchanges, brokerages) often report to the IRS via 1099 forms.
Once the IRS computer receives that report, it assumes you owe tax unless you rebut it.
Without an ROE and proper follow-up documentation, the presumption stands, and the
burden is on you to prove otherwise.
ROE + Capital Gains in Practice
When you have a properly executed ROE, backed by status correction:
-
You remove yourself from the statutory category of “taxpayer”
-
You can respond to third-party reporting with conditional acceptance or affidavit of rebuttal demanding proof of federal jurisdiction over the transaction
-
You demonstrate that the activity was private, non-federally connected, and outside the taxable class
Important Considerations
-
ROE is a jurisdictional defense, not a statutory “exemption”
-
Certain activities with a direct federal nexus, such as selling federal mineral leasesparticipating in federally regulated securities, or contracting with the U.S. government remain within the taxable scope
-
This is a paperwork battle: if the IRS pushes back, you must be ready to stand on your affidavit, case law, and jurisdictional argument
The bottom line, if you sell crypto, Bitcoin, or real estate without an ROE, the IRS will treat the gain as taxable by default.
With a properly executed ROE and supporting documentation, you can challenge that
presumption and keep private property transactions in the private domain, where they belong.

CAPITAL GAINS
The Internal Revenue Service classifies almost every profitable sale of property as a “taxable event.”
Under 26 U.S.C. § 61(a)(3), “gains derived from dealings in property” are included in their
definition of gross income.
-
Cryptocurrency and Bitcoin are treated as “property.” Selling for USD, exchanging for another coin, or even using it to buy goods is, by IRS rules, a taxable event
-
Real Estate: Selling for more than your adjusted basis produces a taxable gain unless youqualify for specific statutory exemptions (e.g., § 121 primary residence exclusion)
This is the default presumption applied to anyone the IRS considers a “taxpayer.”
The ROE Position
-
The Revocation of Election strategy isn’t about “hiding” income, it’s about correcting a legal classification
-
Federal income tax applies to federally connected activities, not to purely private, non-federally privileged transactions
-
If you have revoked the election to be treated as a taxpayer under Subtitle A, you have rebutted the presumption that your gains are part of the federally taxable category
-
Private property transactions, like selling crypto on a peer-to-peer basis or selling private real estate, fall outside the scope of Subtitle A taxation once jurisdiction is properly challenged
Even if your transaction is entirely private, third parties (title companies, crypto exchanges, brokerages) often report to the IRS via 1099 forms.
Once the IRS computer receives that report, it assumes you owe tax unless you rebut it.
Without an ROE and proper follow-up documentation, the presumption stands, and the
burden is on you to prove otherwise.
ROE + Capital Gains in Practice
When you have a properly executed ROE, backed by status correction:
-
You remove yourself from the statutory category of “taxpayer”
-
You can respond to third-party reporting with conditional acceptance or affidavit of rebuttal demanding proof of federal jurisdiction over the transaction
-
You demonstrate that the activity was private, non-federally connected, and outside the taxable class
Important Considerations
-
ROE is a jurisdictional defense, not a statutory “exemption”
-
Certain activities with a direct federal nexus, such as selling federal mineral leasesparticipating in federally regulated securities, or contracting with the U.S. government remain within the taxable scope
-
This is a paperwork battle: if the IRS pushes back, you must be ready to stand on your affidavit, case law, and jurisdictional argument
The bottom line, if you sell crypto, Bitcoin, or real estate without an ROE, the IRS will treat the gain as taxable by default.
With a properly executed ROE and supporting documentation, you can challenge that
presumption and keep private property transactions in the private domain, where they belong.

FROM PRESUMPTION TO PROOF
How to Lawfully Demand Verification Before Any Alleged Obligation Exists
Much of the correspondence people receive from the IRS is not evidence. It is often presumptive, automated, and unsworn. In law, a claim requires verification. Who is making the claim, by what authority, and under oath.
STEP 1 - Demand Verification (Not Explanation)
Explanations are opinions. Verification is evidence. If a notice is unsigned and unsworn, it is not verified.
-
Demand identification of the individual who made the determination
-
Demand certification under penalty of perjury
-
Demand confirmation that a real assessment exists (not merely a notice)
STEP 2 - Demand the Human Claimant
A lawful claim must be asserted by a living man or woman, not a system. If no one will stand behind it, it is not verified.
-
Full name of the individual asserting the claim
-
Official title
-
Fiduciary capacity (personal, official, or representative)
STEP 3 - Demand Lawful Authority (Not Codes)
Statutes and codes are references - not proof of delegation. Authority must be traceable.
-
Proof of delegated authority for the issuing individual/office
-
Scope of authority
-
How that authority applies to the recipient
STEP 4 - Reduce Everything to an Affidavit
An affidavit is sworn testimony. It stands as fact unless rebutted by sworn testimony of equal or greater evidentiary weight from a living person.
-
Make your position a record
-
Require sworn rebuttal (not form letters)
-
Treat silence or unsworn replies as failure to rebut

QUESTIONS TO ASK YOUR TAX PROFESSIONAL
BEFORE YOU SIGN
BEFORE YOU SETTLE
BEFORE YOU COMPLY
If a tax professional is advising you to enter an Offer in Compromise, installment agreement, or any settlement, these questions are not optional. They are foundational!
THE VERIFICATION CHECKLIST
☐ Who is making the claim against me?
-
Full name of the individual
-
Title and role
-
Whether they are acting in a personal or official capacity
☐ Is there a verified claim asserted by a living man or woman?
-
Not a system
-
Not a department
-
Not an automated process
☐ Where is the sworn statement under penalty of perjury?
-
Signed
-
Dated
-
Identifying the claimant
☐ Is there a certified assessment with a wet-ink signature?
-
Not an unsigned notice
-
Not a computer-generated letter
☐ By what lawful authority is jurisdiction being claimed over me?
-
Statute relied upon
-
How it applies to my specific status
THE LIABILITY CHECKLIST
☐ How was liability lawfully determined?
-
Evidence relied upon
-
Method of calculation
-
Opportunity to rebut
☐ Was consent presumed or explicitly given?
-
If given, where is it documented?
☐ What defenses are waived by entering this agreement?
-
Constitutional
-
Statutory
-
Procedural
☐ What rights am I giving up if I sign this?
-
Appeal rights
-
Future challenges
-
Ability to dispute jurisdiction
THE OFFER IN COMPROMISE CHECK
☐ Has verification occurred before recommending an Offer in Compromise?
-
Yes / No
☐ Does this agreement require admission of liability?
-
Yes / No
☐ Does it lock me into future compliance or monitoring?
-
Yes / No
☐ What happens if new evidence invalidates the original claim?
-
Is relief still available?
THE FIDUCIARY QUESTION
A fiduciary is someone who is legally and ethically required to act in your best interest, not their own.
☐ Are you advising me based on verified facts—or standard procedure?
If the answer is “this is how it’s always done,” that is not verification.
DOCUMENT EVERYTHING
☐ Request answers in writing
☐ Ask for supporting documents
☐ Note refusals or deflections
☐ Keep copies of all correspondence
WHY THIS CHECKLIST MATTERS
Most people are advised to comply before proof is produced. Once you sign, relief becomes conditional.

THE CPA CHALLENGE
This challenge is directed respectfully, but directly, at CPAs, enrolled agents, tax attorneys, and firms who routinely guide clients into Offer in Compromise, installment agreements, and long-term compliance without first demanding verification.
If your advice is sound, this should be easy.
THIS IS NOT AN ATTACK. IT IS A PROFESSIONAL CHALLENGE.
We are not questioning intentions, we are questioning the process. If you are advising a client to admit liability, enter a settlement, waive rights, sign under penalty or lock themselves into future compliance, then the underlying claim must be verified first.
That is not radical, that is foundational.
THE CPA BURDEN OF PROOF
Before advising any client to settle, compromise, or comply, produce:
-
A verified claim asserted by a living man or woman
-
A signed assessment, sworn under penalty of perjury
-
The lawful authority granting jurisdiction
-
The method by which liability was lawfully determined
-
The real party willing to stand behind the claim personally
-
Not assumptions
-
Not internal policy
-
Not, that’s how it’s always done
HARD QUESTIONS FOR PROFESSIONALS
-
If the claim is real, why is verification never requested
-
If the assessment is lawful, why is it unsigned
-
If jurisdiction is proper, why is it presumed
-
If liability is certain, why does no one swear to it
These are not anti-professional questions, they are fiduciary questions.
OFFER IN COMPROMISE: THE ELEPHANT IN THE ROOM
An 'Offer in Compromise' requires:
-
Admission of liability
-
Waiver of defenses
-
Consent to jurisdiction
-
Long-term compliance obligations
That is not resolution, that is managed surrender.
WHAT THIS CHALLENGE ASKS YOU TO DO
Before advising compliance:
-
Pause
-
Verify
-
Document
Ask the same questions your client never knew they could ask. If the answers exist, produce them. If they don’t, ask why your client is being told to sign anyway.
THIS IS ABOUT PROFESSIONAL INTEGRITY
True professionalism is not measured by:
-
How fast you settle
-
How smoothly you process paperwork
-
How well you manage fear
It is measured by whether you protect your client from unverified claims.
WE INVITE DIALOGUE NOT DEFENSE
-
If our position is wrong, prove it
-
Show the verified claim
-
Show the sworn assessment
-
Show the authority
-
We will publish it
FEAR ENDS WHERE VERIFICATION BEGINS
Finally
Experience
Absolute
Relief