Section 4 | Mysite 7

THE UNTOLD STORY

Most Americans assume:

THE FEDERAL RESERVE IS PART OF THE U.S. GOVERNMENT
THE IRS IS CONSTITUTIONALLY PART OF THE U.S. GOVERNMENT
INCOME TAX HAS ALWAYS EXISTED

However, despite the name:

THE FEDERAL RESERVE IS NOT FEDERAL
THE FEDERAL RESERVE HAS NO RESERVES
THE FEDERAL RESERVE IS NOT PART OF THE U.S. TREASURY

The Federal Reserve was created on December 23, 1913 (just before Christmas, while most of Congress was away) by the Federal Reserve Act, which was authorized by President Woodrow Wilson, who later said it was the biggest mistake of his presidency.

The Federal Reserve is a private banking cartel, owned and operated by a group of international banks, including the likes of Goldman Sachs, JPMorgan, and others. It was modeled after the central banks of Europe, designed to control the money supply and trap governments in perpetual debt.

The Federal Reserve:

Issues debt-based currency (Federal Reserve Notes)
Loans money to the U.S. government with interest
Controls inflation and interest rates through manipulation, not free market
Operates outside of constitutional accountability

Before 1913, America had no central bank and no income tax. After 1913, both were locked in place.

The Internal Revenue Service is not a U.S. government agency created by Congress. In fact, it was never properly enacted into law. The IRS was formed as the collection arm of the Federal Reserve.

It operates as a Puerto Rico trust, not a domestic federal agency
It is not listed as an agency of the U.S. government in the U.S. Code Title 31
It collects revenue from U.S. citizens to pay interest on the national debt, owed to the Federal Reserve

In other words, the IRS does not fund roads, schools, or social programs like you may believe. It is the collection enforcer for private bankers who profit from your labor through debt-based currency.

THE BIRTH OF THE TAXMAN

The territorial origin of the IRS is seldom explained. After the Spanish-American War (1898), the United States acquired several territories, including Puerto Rico, Guam, and the Philippine Islands.

In the early 1900s, the Bureau of Internal Revenue (BIR) was established in the Philippines, by the U.S. government, to tax the people of that territory, NOT Americans living in the states.

In 1904, the U.S. War Department established a Bureau of Internal Revenue in the Philippine Islands. This bureau was designed to administer and collect taxes in a U.S. territory, where Congress had full authority.

Over time, similar revenue structures were expanded to other territories (like Puerto Rico), which remain the legal home for IRS trusts and agents. These territorial revenue systems were never repealed, instead, they were repurposed to operate against Americans in the 50 states by presumption.

Because Congress has plenary power (total control) over U.S. territories, it could create tax laws there that do not apply constitutionally to the 50 states.

But over time, the government:

Created IRS-related trusts in Puerto Rico (see IRS EINs tied to Puerto Rico in corporate records)
Relied on maritime/admiralty jurisdiction to apply foreign or territorial tax law to Americans under presumed contract
Used the legal fiction (ALL CAPS NAME) to treat you like a federal entity or territorial resident

This is how you, a private man or woman in a state like Tennessee or Texas, were presumed to be a "U.S. person" subject to territorial tax codes never meant to apply to you.

The evidence of Territorial Jurisdiction is clear:

IRS operations are tied to the Department of the Treasury, not Congress.
The Internal Revenue Manual admits the IRS is not created by statute.
26 U.S. Code § 7701 defines "United States" to mean federal territory, unless otherwise specified.
IRS entities often use addresses tied to Puerto Rico, Guam, or Washington D.C., not the states of the Union.

The IRS did not start in Washington D.C. It started in a U.S. territory, and its laws still function as if you live in one. The IRS is a territorial collection agency, expanded by deception into the 50 states through fraud, presumption, and silence.

None of this is constitutional for the following reasons:

The U.S. Constitution (Article I, Section 8) gives Congress the power to coin money, not a private bank.
The 16th Amendment, which supposedly authorized the income tax, was never properly ratified (see The Law That Never Was by Bill Benson).
The creation of the IRS and the Federal Reserve violated the original Republic and replaced it with a corporate debt machine.

The IRS and Federal Reserve are two sides of the same coin:

One creates debt.
The other collects tribute.

And you were born into this system without your knowledge or consent.

The Revocation of Election is how you begin removing yourself from that contract.

IRS DEBT

If the IRS believes that you owe them a debt, they are operating under one core assumption:

That you elected to be treated as a “taxpayer”, a U.S. person subject to the Internal Revenue Code (IRC).

That “election” is presumed when you:

File a 1040
Sign a W-4
Accept a Social Security Number
Receive mail addressed to the ALL CAPS NAME
Respond to IRS notices without rebutting jurisdiction

If you have never rebutted that presumption, the IRS treats you as a corporate fiction, a taxpayer who is liable for income tax and subject to penalties, interest, and collection.

When you properly execute the Revocation of Election, you are:

Correcting the public record
Rebutting the presumption that you are a 14th Amendment “U.S. citizen”
Declaring your earnings as private, not federally connected income
Withdrawing from the Title 26 jurisdiction

This means:

The IRS no longer has lawful standing to assess or collect taxes from you, unless they can prove:

That you knowingly, willingly, and voluntarily elected to be taxed
That you are engaged in taxable activity (federal employment, corporate privilege, etc.)
That a lawful contract exists

They almost never can.

What About an Offer in Compromise (OIC)?

An OIC is a settlement agreement where you offer to pay less than the full amount you “owe.”

But here's the truth:

By entering into an OIC, you are contractually agreeing that the debt is valid
The OIC makes you liable, even if the original assessment was unlawful
It locks you in as a taxpayer under their terms
You may even waive certain appeal rights

You are negotiating with a thief instead of challenging the theft.

If you have an outstanding IRS debt or are in the OIC process:

Revoke your election under 26 CFR § 1.871-1(a)
Issue a conditional acceptance demanding proof of jurisdiction, valid contract, and lawful liability
Challenge the validity of the original assessment, not just the amount owed
Assert your status as a nonresident to the IRS and private man or woman on the land
Remove power of attorney or tax return preparers who operate in Title 26 jurisdiction

ROE is not magic and does not erase your IRS file overnight. But it removes your presumed consent and triggers a jurisdictional challenge the IRS cannot easily overcome.

Once jurisdiction is gone, so is their ability to enforce collection.

If the IRS continues to pursue you after ROE, you now have:

Standing to sue for damages
Leverage to rebut their claims
A lawful basis to resist collection

After I file my ROE, can I get my money back?

YES, if:

You file a 1040-X (amended return) within 3 years of your original filing or 2 years of payment.
You use normal reasons the IRS accepts (like a math error, missing deduction, or correcting status).

NO, if:

You claim your wages were not income, or you are not a U.S. citizen, or that you were never required to file.
These kinds of arguments are seen as frivolous, and they will deny your refund, fast.

You have already said, “I do not consent to be treated as a taxpayer.” So going back and asking for a taxpayer refund puts you in a weird contradiction. It’s like telling the IRS, “I am no longer your customer, but I want a refund for all the stuff I used to buy.”

Bottom line, trying to claw them back is usually an uphill legal battle, and one the IRS is ready for.

Better to focus on a better tomorrow and stop the bleeding going forward.

NEW BEGINNINGS

Once you've filed your Revocation of Election (ROE), you are no longer obligated to file IRS Form 1040 or any personal income tax return, as long as you remain consistent in your status and avoid re-contracting with the IRS.

DO NOT file 1040 or any amended returns post-ROE.
DO NOT sign or submit a W-4, W-9, or any IRS forms that presume taxpayer status.
DO NOT apply for government programs that require tax documentation (unless rebutted).
Publish or record your Affidavit of Status and ROE declaration.
Respond to any IRS contact with a Conditional Acceptance and demand for proof of jurisdiction.
Use affidavits and notices to rebut presumptions of taxpayer status in all financial dealings.
Maintain paper records of all correspondence and filings.
Educate any employer or financial institution about your status and provide legal notices if needed.
Remember, sovereignty is maintained through consistency, knowledge, and timely rebuttals.
You are now operating under Natural Law, not statutory code.
If you do not volunteer, they cannot presume.

1754322444520-5ad0ab21-4995-4158-bcf2-f8c6e9f0e741_37_edited.jpg

CONDITIONAL ACCEPTANCE

A Conditional Acceptance is a lawful, non-combative way to respond to demands or threats, especially from government agencies like the IRS, without agreeing or submitting.

It is one of your most powerful tools!

Instead of saying: “No” (which can trigger penalties or escalation) “I refuse to comply” (which they treat as non-cooperation)

You say: “I am willing to comply, IF you can prove you have the authority to make the demand.”

This flips the burden of proof back onto them, where it belongs.

Remember, he who makes the claim bears the burden of proof. If they claim you owe money or are required to file, they must prove it. If they cannot (and they usually can’t), you are not lawfully obligated.

If the IRS sends you a notice saying you owe them $7,500 in back taxes for 2021, instead of ignoring it or arguing, you respond like this:

“I conditionally accept your offer to pay $7,500 upon proof of claim that:

I am lawfully required to file a 1040 tax return
I am a taxpayer as defined in Title 26
My compensation for labor qualifies as income
The IRS has lawful jurisdiction over me, a private man
A valid contract exists between me and the IRS
My consent was given knowingly, voluntarily, and intentionally

Upon your verified rebuttal of each point above, I will promptly settle the matter in full.

This is not a refusal. It’s a lawful demand for evidence and it protects your rights while putting the burden on them.

It prevents them from defaulting you into agreement (which happens when you stay silent).
It creates a paper trail showing that you tried in good faith to settle, lawfully and peacefully.
It sets up your defense later, if they try to escalate.

And if they do not respond with proof, which they usually won’t, you can:

Issue a Notice of Default.
Issue a Notice of Fault and Opportunity to Cure.
Issue a Certificate of Non-Response, which becomes your lawful evidence.

A Conditional Acceptance keeps you in honor and puts them in dishonor when they fail to respond. You are no longer reacting emotionally or combatively, you are standing as a man or woman in law, demanding proof, not bowing to presumption.

WHY PEOPLE GO TO PRISON

You have probably heard IRS horror stories about Wesley Snipes, Irwin Schiff and countless
others. But here are the facts that never made the nightly news.

These people did not go to prison for refusing to pay taxes. They went to prison for how they
responded.

The IRS does not jail people because they “do not want to pay.” They do jail people who:

Do not file (which creates a presumption of fraud)
Ignore IRS notices instead of rebutting them
Use false documents, frivolous arguments, or claim “zero income” without a lawful basis
Refuse to show up in court or defend themselves properly
Assume their beliefs alone will protect them

Wesley Snipes’ case is a perfect example. He relied on bad advice, failed to file, and did not
rebut the IRS’s presumption with lawful notices. His beliefs may have been right, but his process was wrong. It is our mission to keep you out of that trap.

Debt Solution Revolution teaches you how to:

Lawfully revoke your election
Respond to IRS letters with conditional acceptance, not defiance
Correct presumption, not escalate it
Navigate jurisdiction, not ignore it

It’s not what you believe that protects you, it is how you stand and what you put on the record.

Most remember the headline: “Wesley Snipes went to prison for not paying his taxes”. But the truth is far more instructive, and important if you want to stay free.

Snipes’ charges included six counts for failing to file a tax return and two counts for

making false claims for refunds. His legal team submitted documents claiming he owed no taxes, based on arguments that courts have long ruled as “frivolous”.

He relied on a group promoting the idea that wages are not taxable, a concept rooted in

truth but misapplied in court. He did not file returns for several years (1999–2004) but still earned millions of dollars. He submitted false refund claims for nearly $12 million.

He did not rebut the IRS lawfully. Instead, he tried to outsmart them with paperwork games instead of lawful notices and procedural challenges.

What He Did Wrong:

He stopped filing altogether which triggered willful failure to file charges, which is federal crime under 26 U.S.C. § 7203.
He used discredited arguments (like the “no law makes me liable” defense) which courts routinely reject.
He did not challenge jurisdiction properly. Instead of rebutting presumption via affidavit and contract principles, he used confrontational tactics.
He trusted the wrong advisors. His defense team failed to separate truth from strategy.
Knowing the system is rigged is not enough. You must beat it lawfully.

What You Can Learn:

Never stop filing, instead, revoke the election and rebut presumption.
Use conditional acceptance, affidavits, and lawful due process, not “paper terrorism.”
Learn the difference between commercial remedy and criminal risk.

Wesley Snipes served 3 years in federal prison, not because he was wrong to question the IRS,

but because he did not know how to do it the right way.

We do. And we are here to show you how.

Capital Gains: Crypto, Bitcoin, and Real Estate After ROE

The Internal Revenue Service classifies almost every profitable sale of property as a “taxable event.”

Under 26 U.S.C. § 61(a)(3), “gains derived from dealings in property” are included in their
definition of gross income.

Cryptocurrency and Bitcoin are treated as “property.” Selling for USD, exchanging for another coin, or even using it to buy goods is, by IRS rules, a taxable event.
Real Estate: Selling for more than your adjusted basis produces a taxable gain unless youqualify for specific statutory exemptions (e.g., § 121 primary residence exclusion).

This is the default presumption applied to anyone the IRS considers a “taxpayer.”

The ROE Position

The Revocation of Election strategy isn’t about “hiding” income, it’s about correcting a legal classification.
Federal income tax applies to federally connected activities, not to purely private, non-federally privileged transactions.
If you have revoked the election to be treated as a taxpayer under Subtitle A, you have rebutted the presumption that your gains are part of the federally taxable category.
Private property transactions, like selling crypto on a peer-to-peer basis or selling private real estate, fall outside the scope of Subtitle A taxation once jurisdiction is properly challenged.

Even if your transaction is entirely private, third parties (title companies, crypto exchanges, brokerages) often report to the IRS via 1099 forms.

Once the IRS computer receives that report, it assumes you owe tax unless you rebut it.
Without an ROE and proper follow-up documentation, the presumption stands, and the
burden is on you to prove otherwise

ROE + Capital Gains in Practice

When you have a properly executed ROE, backed by status correction:

You remove yourself from the statutory category of “taxpayer.”
You can respond to third-party reporting with conditional acceptance or affidavit of rebuttal demanding proof of federal jurisdiction over the transaction.
You demonstrate that the activity was private, non-federally connected, and outside the taxable class.

Important Considerations

ROE is a jurisdictional defense, not a statutory “exemption.”

Certain activities with a direct federal nexus, such as selling federal mineral leasesparticipating in federally regulated securities, or contracting with the U.S. government remain within the taxable scope.

This is a paperwork battle: if the IRS pushes back, you must be ready to stand on your affidavit, case law, and jurisdictional argument.

Bottom Line

If you sell crypto, Bitcoin, or real estate without an ROE, the IRS will treat the gain as taxable by default.

With a properly executed ROE and supporting documentation, you can challenge that
presumption and keep private property transactions in the private domain, where they belong.